Solutions by Sensitive Data Collection

Vault Protects Your Customers’ Financial Data from Privacy and Data Theft Exposure

Continuous monitoring and detection by Vault reduces your organization’s exposure to GDPR, LGPD (Brazil), FTC actions, and large litigation settlements for Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) violations, as well as others.

Sensitive Data - Financial

In Financial Data Leaks, Consumer and Business Harm is Tangible

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) compliance requires robust encryption, clear privacy notices, and strict limits on the disclosure of Nonpublic Personal Information (NP). Vault protects you from FTC enforcement actions and large litigation settlements that have already cost companies millions of dollars.

Capital One

Capital One Financial CCPA Precedent (2025)

The Northern District of California set a precedent by allowing a CCPA claim in a class-action to proceed despite the absence of any alleged data theft. The plaintiffs claimed that Capital One unlawfully disclosed protected data to third and fourth parties. A motion by Capital One Financial to dismiss the CIPA claim was also denied.

Truist

Truist Financial CIPA Settlement (2025)

Truist’s third-party tracker activation turned ordinary site visits in a class-action CIPA claim. Truist settled (terms undisclosed) for unlawfully capturing communication metadata, IP addresses, URLs visited, click paths, form activity, and more.

J.P. Morgan

JPMorgan Chase CIPA Class Action (2024)

A class action was filed against JPMorgan Chase alleging that the bank “conspired with Facebook to intercept” customers’ sensitive financial information, sending to Facebook, via its pixel, details of credit card and loan applications on Chase.com.

How Vault JS Supports Compliance with Financial Data Laws

Icon

Avoid FTC Actions and Legal Settlements

Vault detects personal financial information before it’s transmitted.

Icon

Monitor Trackers in Checkout and Account Flows

Vault audits your third-party scripts, pixels, SDKs, and embedded DTT.

Icon

Maintain Compliance with Financial Privacy Laws

Stay ahead of GLBA requirements and FTC enforcement actions.

Icon

Generate Audit-Ready Evidence

Download documentation of all financial data activities, disclosures, and safeguards.

Icon

Safeguard Your Reputation

Vault keeps you out of the headlines and in your customers’ good graces.

Key Financial Data Compliance Capabilites

How we manage risk in a changing environment

Financial Data Detection

Vault detects when nonpublic personal financial information is being collected before appropriate safeguards are applied. Detected data includes account numbers, payment card data, routing numbers, transaction details, Social Security numbers, and financial identifiers that are transmitted via network requests, URLs, cookies, or SDK calls.

CMP Implementation and Coverage

Vault verifies that key privacy controls are present and functioning across your site. We detect links and embedded connections that transmit data externally, confirm the presence of required privacy notices, and ensure your CMP loads and operates as expected before tracking technologies activate.

Meta Tracking Pixel Protection

The Meta Pixel is at the center of numerous CIPA-based class-action suits. Vault detects when you are inadvertently sending Meta-sensitive data; when any Pixel or conversion event ignores user consent; and when the Conversions API (CAPI) transmits Personally Identifiable Information or lacks consent.

Tracker and Script Monitoring

Vault shows you where analytics scripts, ad pixels, tag managers, embedded SDKs, or other DTTs (digital tracking technologies) collect or transmit sensitive, private financial data during checkout, account login, loan applications, or other financial interactions subject to GLBA and related privacy laws.

Safeguard-State Testing

Vault simulates user sessions across payment, login, and account-management flows to verify whether financial data is properly encrypted, restricted, and blocked from third-party tracking tools in accordance with the GLBA Safeguards Rule and PCI requirements.

Cross-Platform Visibility

Unified monitoring provides visibility across websites, mobile apps, payment portals, embedded financial widgets, and backend APIs to ensure sensitive financial information is not collected, shared, or retained in violation of GLBA, PCI DSS, or state privacy regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal law that governs how financial institutions collect, protect, and share consumers’ nonpublic personal information (NPI). Enacted in 1999, it includes two primary components relevant to privacy and security: the Privacy Rule, which regulates disclosure and data-sharing practices, and the Safeguards Rule, which requires financial institutions to implement a comprehensive written information security program.

GLBA applies broadly to “financial institutions,” defined as companies significantly engaged in financial activities. This includes banks, credit unions, mortgage lenders, insurance companies, securities firms, and many fintech companies. It can also apply to non-bank entities, such as tax preparers, payday lenders, auto dealerships offering financing, investment advisors, and certain SaaS platforms that handle financial data on behalf of covered entities.

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), nonpublic personal information (NPI) is personally identifiable financial information that is not publicly available and is provided by a consumer in connection with a financial product or service. This includes names, addresses, Social Security numbers, income, assets, account numbers, and credit history, as well as information generated through transactions, including account balances, payment histories, loan details, and investment activity. It also covers information obtained from third parties, like credit reports or underwriting data.

Yes, depending on the nature of the activities involved. GBLA applies to “financial institutions,” defined as companies significantly engaged in financial activities. This includes not only banks and lenders, but also many fintech companies offering payment processing, lending, investing, digital wallets, money transmission, or financial account access.

E-commerce companies are typically not covered simply for accepting credit card payments. However, if they offer financing, installment payment programs, private-label credit, or other financial products, GLBA obligations may attach. Similarly, SaaS platforms that process or store consumer financial data on behalf of covered financial institutions may be treated as service providers and must comply with portions of the Safeguards Rule.

The Safeguards Rule within the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires covered financial institutions to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to protect nonpublic personal information (NPI). Recent updates to the Safeguards Rule increased prescriptive requirements, especially around encryption, authentication, and reporting to boards or senior leadership.

At a high level, organizations must:

  • Designate a qualified individual to oversee the security program
  • Conduct periodic risk assessments
  • Implement administrative, technical, and physical safeguards
  • Encrypt sensitive data in transit and at rest
  • Implement access controls and multi-factor authentication
  • Monitor and test the effectiveness of security controls
  • Oversee and contractually require safeguards from service providers
  • Develop incident response and breach response procedures

The Privacy Rule, issued under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), governs how financial institutions disclose and share consumers’ nonpublic personal information (NPI). The rule does not prohibit all data sharing, but limits it outside of specified exceptions, such as disclosures necessary to process transactions or comply with legal obligations. If an institution shares NPI beyond those permitted exceptions, it must provide consumers with a meaningful opportunity to opt out.

At its core, the Privacy Rule requires institutions to:

  • Provide a clear initial privacy notice when a customer relationship begins
  • Deliver annual privacy notices (with limited exceptions)
  • Describe what information is collected, how it is used, and with whom it is shared
  • Explain consumers’ right to opt out of certain information sharing with nonaffiliated third parties

They can, depending on how they are configured and what data they collect. Under GBLA, financial institutions must limit unauthorized disclosure of nonpublic personal information (NPI). If analytics tools, advertising pixels, tag managers, or embedded SDKs collect or transmit financial account details, application data, transaction identifiers, or other NPI to third parties, that transmission may constitute an impermissible disclosure.

Risk often arises on login pages, account dashboards, loan applications, or checkout confirmation pages where financial information may appear in URLs, form fields, or metadata. Even persistent identifiers tied to specific financial activity can raise concerns if shared outside permitted exceptions. Under the Safeguards Rule, institutions must also oversee service providers and ensure appropriate contractual and technical controls are in place.

Violations of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) can result in civil penalties, regulatory enforcement actions, and even criminal liability.

The FTC and federal banking regulators may impose civil monetary penalties of up to $100,000 per violation for institutions and up to $10,000 per violation for individuals who knowingly ignored regulations. Officers and directors may also face removal or prohibition orders. In cases involving knowing and willful violations, criminal penalties can include fines and potential imprisonment.

Beyond statutory penalties, institutions often face consent orders requiring multi-year compliance monitoring, mandatory security upgrades, third-party audits, and board-level reporting. Financial data incidents may also trigger state enforcement, class-action litigation, contractual penalties (including PCI-related consequences), and significant reputational harm.

The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) enforces financial data privacy and security requirements primarily through the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive practices.

Under GLBA, the FTC enforces both the Privacy Rule (governing disclosures and opt-out rights) and the Safeguards Rule (requiring comprehensive security programs). The agency can investigate through civil investigative demands (CIDs), subpoenas, and audits. If violations are found, the FTC may negotiate consent orders requiring corrective action, long-term compliance monitoring, third-party security assessments, and periodic reporting to the Commission.

Vault analyzes live network traffic and runtime behavior to identify when nonpublic personal financial information (NPI) is collected or transmitted outside approved channels. It inspects requests, responses, URLs, cookies, form submissions, SDK calls, and third-party scripts to detect account numbers, payment data, transaction details, Social Security numbers, or other financial identifiers moving through the application.

The platform maps those data flows against GLBA Safeguards Rule expectations and internal consent or disclosure logic to determine whether information is being exposed to analytics tools, advertising pixels, or other vendors without proper authorization. Because many leaks occur through embedded scripts or confirmation-page parameters, Vault focuses on real-time behavior — not just static code reviews.

Yes. Vault is designed to analyze high-risk flows such as checkout pages, payment confirmation screens, account logins, loan applications, and account dashboards — anywhere sensitive financial information is most likely to be present.

It inspects live network traffic during these sessions to detect whether account numbers, payment card data, routing numbers, transaction identifiers, or other nonpublic personal information are transmitted to third-party scripts, analytics tools, or advertising pixels. Vault also evaluates whether financial data appears in URLs, query parameters, page metadata, or SDK calls that may be captured unintentionally.

Vault analyzes runtime behavior rather than relying solely on static code inspection. It monitors live network requests, JavaScript execution, SDK activity, and tag manager deployments to determine which third-party scripts are active during sensitive flows such as checkout, account login, loan applications, or account dashboards.

The platform correlates those scripts with the data elements present in the same session, including account numbers, payment identifiers, transaction details, or other nonpublic personal information governed by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA). If a script receives or transmits financial data outside approved processors, Vault flags the exposure.

Yes. Vault supports audit readiness by producing structured, timestamped evidence of how financial data is collected, transmitted, and protected in real-world environments. For the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) Safeguards Rule, Vault helps document whether nonpublic personal information is restricted from unauthorized third-party scripts, whether sensitive data appears in URLs or request payloads, and whether controls function as intended during login and checkout flows. This supports a risk-based security program and ongoing monitoring requirements.

For the Privacy Rule, Vault provides visibility into data-sharing behavior, helping confirm that disclosures align with stated privacy notices and that NPI is not transmitted beyond permitted exceptions. Exportable reports can be used to demonstrate oversight, vendor monitoring, and corrective action — all of which are central during regulatory reviews or third-party audits.

Avoid the multiple costs of exposing financial data